YourPersonalSafety

This mark, when displayed by a contractor, indicates that company’s
dedication to protecting the safety and well-being of you and your family. While it is rare
that employees of home service contractors are involved in crimes against
homeowners, it can and does happen.
How often have you opened your door to a service repairman only to feel extremely
uncomfortable once he’s inside your house?

It’s not something many people think about until it’s too late, but anyone who might feel
uncomfortable at home alone with a service technician deserves to be safe from harm,
including:

* women at home alone or with small children during the day
* elderly homeowners
* disabled individuals
* anyone else who is concerned about their personal safety and the security of
their home and their belongings

You can minimize your risk when hiring a home services contractor by going with a
contractor who displays the Technician Seal of Safety™. You owe it to yourself and
your family to make sure that you are inviting individuals into your home who have been
screened by a pre-employment background check and who are tested for illegal drug
use as permitted by law.

That’s why the Technician Seal of Safety™ symbol was established: to let you,
the homeowner, know at a glance which contractors stand out from the crowd when it
comes to protecting the safety of you and your family.

Each of these companies bearing the Technician Seal of Safety™ is a member of a
professional contractor organization that advocates the use of pre-employment
background checks and drug testing as allowed by law. Now, many contractors in the
home services business do not bother to practice such stringent policies. But that’s
what distinguishes these elite contractors from the rest. When you see the Technician
Seal of Safety™ you know you’re dealing with a professional who cares about your
personal safety, the safety of your family, and the well-being and security of your home

how much do you know about
The people working in your home?

From abcnews.com

June 28 — Most of us can't imagine inviting a convicted felon into our home. However, many families
are doing just that.

The recent revelation that Utah police investigating the kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart are focusing
attention on an ex-convict who worked as a handyman in the Smarts' home is bringing more attention
to the problem.
Criminal background checks are required for workers in some professions — like teachers, school
bus drivers and some health-care workers — but they are not mandated for most other jobs.

As a result, all around the country there are examples of home service companies taking on
dangerous employees. In Kansas City, ex-convict Wesley Purkey was working as a plumber when he
beat to death an 80-year-old woman. In California, ex-convict Mesa Kasem worked as a deliveryman
for an auction house when he and an accomplice murdered one of the clients. And in Pennsylvania,
convicted felon John Cramer was working as a meter reader when he raped a woman in her home. In
each of these cases the employer did not conduct a criminal background check.

Some law enforcement officials believe all employers who provide home services should conduct
background checks and they should not hire anyone with a criminal record. There are, tragically,
many examples that bolster his argument.

Six years ago, Don and Terina Ferminick and their and five-month-old daughter had just moved to
Alameda, Calif., where Don took a position as a church minister. "Our life was wonderful," Ferminick
says of his life then. But Ferminick's family was permanently scarred when Giles Nadey came to clean
the carpets of the church rectory.

Terina went to the rectory to pay Nadey and never returned. That evening Ferminick went to check on
Terina and found his wife stabbed to death and covered with blood. There was even blood on the
walls. "I guess through the course of events, he sodomized her, and I guess to cover up what he had
done he decided to take her life," Ferminick says.

Nadey was later convicted of the murder and sentenced to death. What was particularly troubling to
Ferminick was the thought that his wife's murder might have been prevented. Had Nadey's employers
bothered to run a background check, they would have learned that he had two previous felony
convictions. Nadey even acknowledged his criminal record on his job application, but the company still
hired him to clean carpets in people's homes.

Two years later, in the same county, Kerry Spooner-Dean, a 30-year-old pediatrician, was viciously
stabbed to death by another carpet cleaner named Jerrold Woods. Woods had eight prior convictions
for armed robbery, but the carpet cleaning company never did a background check. Dan Dean, the
victim's husband, recently won a $9 million judgment against the company.

Too Expensive to Monitor?

Domino's, which settled a lawsuit with a Nebraska woman who was raped by David Taitte, one of its
deliverymen, notes that it delivers over 7 million pizzas a week and this was the first incident of its kind.

The company canceled the contract with the local franchise because it failed to check Taitte's driving
record, but it does not require its franchise owners to do criminal background checks. Company
officials say the procedure would be too expensive and complicated.

Taitte is serving 25-30 years in a Nebraska prison for the rape. At the time he applied for his job at
Domino's, he had already been in jail 16 times, including once for sexual assault. He says he knew
Domino's would not hire him if he admitted to his convictions. So he left the box blank on the
application where it asked if he was a felon.

Taitte argues that denying ex-cons jobs keeps them from rehabilitating themselves. "They already
served their time and they're just looking to try to get a new job — start a new life."

But Oakland County prosecutor Jim Anderson, whose office handled both the Ferminick and the
Spooner-Dean murders, calls the issue a "no-brainer."

Consultant Barry Shamis, like Anderson, believes that people are put at risk when companies fail to
do background checks on workers who provide in-home services. "If you don't do criminal background
checks, you're making a huge mistake."

Shamis says many companies are afraid of the cost of background checks, but argues that the
checks are relatively inexpensive. Companies like American Background say they can do a fairly
thorough check of a job applicant's history — county by county — for $30 to $60. And Tony Raker,
who works for the company, says the checks turn up criminal records with a startling frequency —
more than one in every 10 employees. At one company, 22 percent of the applicants for the job of
cable TV installer come up with criminal records.

Can They Afford Not to?

More and more companies that don't conduct checks have to deal with expensive lawsuits.

Sears Roebuck and Co. settled a lawsuit for an undisclosed amount with a Maryland woman who was
assaulted in her home by one of its carpet cleaners. Again, the worker had a long criminal record
when he started cleaning carpets for Sears. Though he technically worked for a subcontractor that
did not do a background check, the victim filed a lawsuit against Sears. The company now requires
background checks of all their home service workers.

In another example, Kristi Reade successfully sued the Kirby Company, which makes vacuum
cleaners, after a salesman sexually assaulted her nine years ago. At the time, the assailant was on
probation for indecency with a child and the independent distributor that hired him never checked his
background.

Kirby says it "has sold millions of machines to satisfied individuals" and although background checks
were suggested in the past, the company has "modified its prior policy to require distributors to
conduct these background checks."

As for Reade, she and her family have moved to a different state and she says she never opens her
door to any workers unless someone else is there with her. "Until companies make a commitment to
check every person they hire," she says, "Every time a woman lets someone into her home, she's at
risk."